A young African boy studying at a wooden table under a bright lamp in a rural clay-walled home, symbolising hope despite energy poverty.
A child studies under a single lamp in a rural African household — a reminder of the resilience and potential that light can unlock.

The Lights Are Still Off: What COP30’s Promises Mean for the African Child

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Help This Message Travel

When negotiators at COP30 announced new climate-finance commitments in Belém, my mind went to the children I met earlier this year in a village outside Makurdi, Nigeria, six boys and girls bent over their schoolbooks under a single kerosene lamp, eyes squinting in the dim yellow burn. You could hear the buzzing of insects, the flick of pages, and the quiet rhythm of children trying to learn in darkness that should no longer exist.

These are the children COP30 was supposed to help.
These are the children who still wait.

In climate conferences, we talk in billions; USD 300 billion by 2035, tripled adaptation finance, fossil-fuel transition pathways, and voluntary roadmaps, etc. But for the African child, the real question is simple:

“Will this bring light to my home?”

So far, the answer is still uncertain.

Promises without power

COP30 gave the world many declarations, roadmaps and finance projections, but very few binding obligations. For Africa, where 600 million people still lack electricity, and nearly one billion depend on firewood or charcoal for cooking, ambiguity is a burden.

The new financing pledges sound historic. On paper, they are. But Africa has seen commitments before: the USD 100 billion pledge from Copenhagen, the Paris Agreement’s adaptation goals, and the Glasgow pledges to triple access investment. Some were delayed. Most never arrived. Others were reallocated or rebranded.

This is the gap between political ambition and practical delivery, and African children grow up inside that gap.

At COP30, leaders agreed to triple adaptation finance by 2035. They reaffirmed a USD 300 billion-per-year climate finance track. They endorsed a new Global Goal on Adaptation with 59 indicators. They launched new partnerships for clean electricity access, grid expansion, and clean cooking in schools.

These are good signals.
But signals do not light classrooms.
They do not power clinics.
They do not reduce the 2.5 million annual deaths from household air pollution.

Children cannot study on declarations.

The African child at the centre of the transition

Whenever Africa debates energy, children are almost invisible in the conversation. We focus on megawatts, investment flows, transmission lines, and minerals. Yet children live the consequences of a failed transition more directly than anyone else.

They inhale the smoke of firewood kitchens.
They learn in overheated, unventilated classrooms.
They drink unsafe water when pumps fail.
They miss school during floods and heatwaves.
They sleep without cooling during lethal heat nights.
They watch communities uprooted by drought or storms.

Energy is not a sector.
It is the foundation of childhood.

This is why COP30 matters: not because leaders signed documents, but because the outcomes will decide whether a generation of African children grows up with dignity or deprivation.

What COP30 got right and where It fell short

1. A Shift Toward Energy Access (But Slow and Underfunded)

For the first time in years, COP30 explicitly recognised universal electricity access and clean cooking as central to the climate agenda. Initiatives like the UN Electricity Access Plan (2035) and the Clean Cooking in Schools platform offer real entry points for African governments to demand support.

But these platforms are voluntary.
There is no guaranteed funding.
Timelines stretch far beyond the urgency children live with every day.

2. Fossil Fuel Ambivalence (Hurting the Most Vulnerable)

The absence of a binding fossil fuel phase-out, replaced with voluntary transition pathways, is not an abstract diplomatic flaw. It is a future written in heatwaves, floods, crop failures, and hunger.

Every year of delay worsens the climate shocks African children inherit.

3. Adaptation Finance: Hopeful, But Delayed

Tripling adaptation finance by 2035 is too distant for communities already hit by climate disasters. Many African governments need adaptation financing now, not in a decade. Children living through today’s extreme heat cannot wait for 2035.

4. The Just Transition Mechanism (Promise Without Power)

A framework for just transition is welcome. But without finance, it is a moral statement, not a structural tool. For children in coal towns, oil regions and mining communities, justice delayed is childhood denied.

Electricity is the pathway to possibility

The African child’s life is shaped by one simple fact:
Electricity determines opportunity.

A child with light can study.
A child with power can cool a room during heatwaves.
A child with a fridge can enjoy safe food and medicine.
A child with connected parents gains economic stability.
A child with a powered clinic at birth enters the world safer.

Yet millions of African children grow up in darkness.

Darkness is not neutral.
Darkness is a curriculum, one that teaches limitation.

When COP30 leaders speak of numbers and targets, I hear those children flipping pages under a dim flame, their futures narrowing with every hour without power.

What African governments must demand after COP30

We cannot wait for the world’s pace.
Africa must negotiate, plan and act with clarity.

1. Treat energy access as a human right

Universal electricity access should not be framed as development; it is dignity.

2. Channel adaptation finance into energy infrastructure

We must climate-proof our grids, decentralise power systems and scale mini-grids.

3. Prioritise clean cooking as a public health emergency

School feeding programmes, clinics, and rural communities must be the first beneficiaries.

4. Use critical minerals for African industrialisation

We cannot export cobalt to power the world while our children live without light.

5. Build Africa-first financing mechanisms

Domestic capital, pensions, sovereign funds, and diaspora bonds must complement global finance.

A Moral Conclusion

The energy transition is not about carbon alone.
It is about children, their futures, their health, their safety, their hope.

When I think of COP30, I don’t see podiums or pledges.
I see the six children under the kerosene lamp.
I see their eyes half-lit by flame, half-lost in shadow.
I see childhoods that could be filled with light, technology, and creativity, held back by a problem the world already knows how to solve.

If COP30 is to mean anything, it must mean this:

No African child should grow up in the dark.

Follow Energy Transition Africa for more updates: Facebook LinkedIn

Head, Africa Region at  |  + posts

Vincent Egoro is a leading African voice on the just energy transition, fossil fuel phaseout and critical minerals governance. With over a decade of regional advocacy experience, he works at the intersection of transparency, accountability and sustainability, advancing community-driven solutions that put Africa at the heart of global climate action.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *